wiki/attractors/consent
Consent
wiki/attractors/consent/index.mdRendered from markdown source. Open raw source on GitHub.
Consent
This page is an attractor gateway, not a canon declaration. It compresses current evidence in the Work Vault and points toward underlying research.
<!-- BEGIN CURATED SEMANTIC COMPRESSION -->
Semantic Compression
In this vault, consent is not merely permission. It is the boundary condition that determines whether a loop may continue, whether a trace may become admissible, and whether optimization remains aligned with the agency of the living system it touches.
Why It Matters
Consent is the structural difference between participation and extraction. It determines whether memory, governance, provenance, attention, and trust remain alive or collapse into coercive machinery.
Core Motifs
- boundary and authorization
- refusal and reversibility
- semantic fit
- consent as loop condition
- consent gradient
- consentful provenance
<!-- END CURATED SEMANTIC COMPRESSION -->
<!-- BEGIN GENERATED EVIDENCE MAP -->
Primary Research
- Intent-Consent
- Consent-Intent Compression Protocol
- Consent Is the Gradient Mask on Optimization
- The Historical Record of the Future Requires Consentful Loops
- Privacy Is a Membrane, Not a Wall
Adjacent Research
Related Projects
Related Concepts
Related Invariants
Unresolved / Needs Link Resolution
- No unresolved seed links in this pass.
<!-- END GENERATED EVIDENCE MAP -->
<!-- BEGIN OPEN RESEARCH EDGES -->
Open Questions
- How can consent remain legible across time?
- What makes consent revocable in machine-mediated systems?
- When does transparency become coercive?
Next Navigation
- Start with Intent-Consent for the local concept.
- Continue to Consent-Intent Compression Protocol for protocol structure.
- Read Consent Is the Gradient Mask on Optimization for the published_external essay path.
<!-- END OPEN RESEARCH EDGES -->