wiki/projects/telic-field-papers/artifacts/f10-semantic-polytelometry
Telic Fields F.10 — Semantic Polytelometry with Language Models
wiki/projects/telic-field-papers/artifacts/f10-semantic-polytelometry/index.mdRendered from markdown source. Open raw source on GitHub.
--- title: "Telic Fields F.10 — Semantic Polytelometry with Language Models" artifact_date: "2026-07-15" artifact_type: "candidate-foundational-paper" domain: "TELIC-FIELDS" scope: "WORKING" lineage: "THE-TELIC-FIELD-PAPERS" status: "candidate" processing_tier: 4 source_role: "derived-conceptual-artifact" content_canon_status: "unset" publication_status: "unpublished" series_position: "F.10" ---
Telic Fields F.10 — Semantic Polytelometry with Language Models
Parent lineage: The Telic Field Papers
Source artifacts
- F.10 semantic-polytelometry paper
- F.10/G.11 minimum viable architecture
- F.10/G.11 model-role and authority matrix
- F.10/G.11 candidate session record
- Complete F.10/G.11 intake package
The complete package passed its internal SHA-256 manifest before intake. The ZIP hash is 3bb3cdef713c15d9cb4cd533715e496b4f90b00517a3bf68fcd6f818fb79c6fb.
Working focus
F.10 defines semantic polytelometry as a bounded architecture through which language models preserve and transform plural projections long enough for their owners to inspect, correct, coordinate, and navigate them. It separates field, projection, trail, context, mirror, and route, and assigns models explicit roles such as extractor, structurer, translator, comparator, retriever, route generator, challenger, mediator, witness assistant, and narrowly delegated executor.
The architecture binds model capability inside source, standing, authority, consent, provenance, trajectory, contestability, recourse, human re-entry, and lifecycle controls. It distinguishes source, model, provider, and institutional-action layers; addresses sycophancy, false attunement, agentic planning, tool use, memory, and model-mediated breach; and defines proportional governance tiers.
The session record, role matrix, and minimum viable architecture are research artifacts. The model may increase field legibility without gaining title to the field, route, or decision; these artifacts are not Phase I production specifications and do not become canonical by installation.
Roadmap transition
F.10 is complete as a candidate working paper. F.11, G.12, and FG-S are now installed, completing the planned F/G bridge sequence. The next pass is HI-0 — Controlled Branch Opening before deeper H.1 or I.1 branching.