wiki/projects/consent-intent-compression-protocol/protocol-foundations/synaptic-trust-and-propagation

Synaptic Trust and Propagation

wiki/projects/consent-intent-compression-protocol/protocol-foundations/synaptic-trust-and-propagation/index.md

Rendered from markdown source. Open raw source on GitHub.

Synaptic Trust and Propagation

Parent lineage: Consent–Intent Compression Protocol (CICP) / Protocol Foundations

This cluster covers dyadic trust structure, trust filtering, and consent propagation across a field.

It is the continuity layer of the protocol rail: the part that keeps trust transmissible as the field moves.

Current Shape

  • 3 synaptic trust and propagation documents.
  • 1 deeper seam for dyad, filtering, and forwarding.

Representative Files

Working Read

This is the trust and propagation layer: dyads, filtering, and wave-state forwarding for consent continuity.

This cluster describes how trust remains transmissible across the field without collapsing into noise. It is the protocol family’s answer to continuity under movement: dyads establish the unit, filters preserve signal, and wave-state forwarding pushes consent through a live network.

That makes it the operational trust bridge between the model layer and the language layer.

The deeper seam keeps dyad structure, trust filtering, and wave-state forwarding in one child page so propagation can be read as its own continuity mechanism.

Core Claim

Trust is not a binary state. It is a moving relation that can amplify, attenuate, or forward signal depending on context. The synaptic rail says the protocol needs a continuity layer that can preserve trust while it moves.

Mechanisms

  • A synaptic dyad models the relationship itself as the primary unit.
  • Filter profiles can pass, attenuate, or amplify context-specific signal.
  • Timing, synchrony, and decay affect whether the trust flow remains valid.
  • Wave-state forwarding treats propagation as a consented signal path rather than a blind relay.

Terminology

  • Dyad: the two-part relationship unit.
  • Filter profile: per-context signal shaping.
  • Loop density: depth of reinforced exchange in a window.
  • Forwarding: the movement of consented signal across a field.

Implications

This page is important because it keeps the trust story dynamic. The project is not trying to freeze trust into a static identity table; it is trying to make trust context-aware enough to survive movement, delay, and changing conditions.

Open Questions

  • What timing thresholds are needed before a dyad should decay?
  • Which filters are structural, and which are just a local preference?
  • How much propagation can happen before the relationship needs reconsent?

Related Links

Next Actions

  1. Keep the synaptic trust set together.
  2. Keep the trust continuity and forwarding child page stable.
  3. Split only if a third trust-propagation seam appears.