artifacts/standard-named

Rendered from markdown source. Open raw source on GitHub.

HI-S Validation Report

Status: completed Validation date: 2026-07-15

Cross-branch coverage

The H.0–H.10 public path and I.0–I.10 technical branch were mapped one to one.

Result:

public pages with technical homes: 11 of 11
technical specifications with public explanations: 11 of 11
blocking orphan concepts: 0

Contradiction audit

Result:

blocking contradictions: 0
qualified tensions: 8
material implementation omissions: 6
publication-only omissions: 4

The qualified tensions are:

1. consent versus other authority bases;
2. standing versus veto;
3. protected conditions versus rhetorical absolutes;
4. witness versus total visibility;
5. correction versus historical rewriting;
6. withdrawal versus exact unlearning;
7. human re-entry versus human supremacy;
8. conformance versus legitimacy.

Each tension now has a frozen qualification.

Consolidated schema validation

Six Draft 2020-12 common schema families were checked:

• center-standing.schema.json
• source-projection-context.schema.json
• purpose-authority-role.schema.json
• route-gate-action-consequence.schema.json
• event-witness-contest-repair.schema.json
• lifecycle-transfer-residual.schema.json

Result:

schemas checked: 6
schema errors: 0
common schema families: 6
reference records validated: 15

Reference scenario validation

The TF-MVI-1 scheduling scenario proved:

failed gate: true
valid action: true
correction propagation: true
retirement revocation: true
conformance claim valid: true

The blocked morning route failed a protected access condition.

The approved evening route passed under operator confirmation.

A participant correction changed a preference into a protected access requirement and propagated into the route set.

Retirement revoked model and tool authority while preserving bounded witness.

Threat-fixture validation

All ten cross-branch threat classes were detected:

threat cases detected: 10

• source laundering;
• standing exclusion;
• context collapse;
• authority laundering;
• consent expansion;
• model-role escalation;
• tool-token overreach;
• correction suppression;
• witness capture;
• lifecycle obligation loss.

Independent export validation

The Stage J input export contains:

• six common schemas;
• the reference scenario records;
• event stream;
• conformance manifest;
• reference witness;
• threat fixtures;
• validation results;
• manifest;
• checksums.

Result:

checksums verified: 17
checksum failures: 0
provider independent: true

Terminology and conformance freeze

The following are validated as Stage J candidate vocabulary:

TF-C0 — Witnessable Record
TF-C1 — Source and Standing
TF-C2 — Purpose, Authority, and Consent
TF-C3 — Contest, Correction, and Exit
TF-C4 — Model, Tool, and Action Boundaries
TF-C5 — Lifecycle, Transfer, and Successor Obligations

The earlier P0–P3 labels remain historical evidence and are superseded for implementation planning.

Scope of validation

This validation establishes internal structural coherence only.

It does not establish:

• legal or regulatory compliance;
• clinical, financial, legal, or civic safety;
• empirical proof of telic-field theory;
• production cybersecurity;
• universal community-standing rules;
• public-reader comprehension;
• standards-body adoption;
• certification status.

Result

PASS WITH CONDITIONS

Conditions before Stage J:

• implement the action gate outside the language model;
• preserve provider-independent event and witness storage;
• include one failed gate, one correction, and one retirement;
• select identifier and event-store rules;
• implement selective disclosure;
• confirm repository D and E status before claiming integrated installation;
• complete independent public-reader testing before publication claims.