artifacts/standard-named

Rendered from markdown source. Open raw source on GitHub.

HI-3 Validation Report

Status: completed Validation date: 2026-07-15

Schema validation

Ten candidate Draft 2020-12 schemas were checked:

• context-demand-profile.schema.json
• context-capacity-profile.schema.json
• standing-coverage-assessment.schema.json
• participant-load-record.schema.json
• overload-event.schema.json
• capacity-debt-record.schema.json
• authority-degradation-record.schema.json
• stop-escalation-decision.schema.json
• escalation-record.schema.json
• context-reconstitution-record.schema.json

Result:

schemas checked: 10
schema errors: 0

Positive demonstrations

All eight required demonstrations passed:

1. token-rich context remained standing-poor;
2. small context supported a narrow reversible action;
3. protected omission improved privacy and participant-load capacity;
4. overload degraded authority from execute to recommend;
5. missing correction caused stop;
6. participant overload caused staged disclosure;
7. escalation reached a competent outer loop;
8. context reconstitution restored recommendation authority while preserving remaining debt.

Result:

positive demonstrations passed: 8
positive failures: 0

Negative conformance cases

All twelve prohibited patterns were detected:

1. token-count sufficiency;
2. fluent authority persistence;
3. privacy treated as deficit;
4. participant-burden blindness;
5. missing correction ignored;
6. composite-score concealment;
7. hierarchy-only escalation;
8. no-decision without a cost bearer;
9. capacity-debt erasure;
10. authority restoration without reconstitution;
11. small-context rejection;
12. overload without tool-level degradation.

Result:

negative cases detected: 12
undetected negative cases: 0

Independent context-capacity export

The demonstration export contains:

• demand and capacity profiles;
• standing and privacy demonstrations;
• authority degradation;
• stop decision;
• competent escalation;
• recovery and capacity debt;
• event stream;
• schemas;
• manifest;
• checksums.

Result:

checksum files verified: 18
checksum failures: 0
independent_of_capacity_model: true

Public-page consistency review

H.3 was checked against I.3 for the following claims:

• context capacity is not storage or token capacity;
• missing standing differs from missing data;
• contradiction may remain unresolved;
• privacy can increase capacity;
• participant load is a system property;
• authority should degrade as context fails;
• stop and pause have cost bearers;
• escalation must be competence-matched;
• capacity debt survives successful output;
• recovery restores only supported authority.

Result:

technical/public contradictions found: 0

Scope of validation

This report establishes structural and internal semantic validation only.

It does not establish:

• clinical assessment of human capacity;
• universal materiality thresholds;
• legal authority for escalation;
• completeness of standing discovery;
• production security;
• cryptographic enforcement;
• public-reader comprehension;
• scientific validity of a universal context-capacity model.

Conditions before production use

• define domain-specific materiality thresholds;
• authenticate standing and correction records;
• enforce authority degradation at the credential and tool layers;
• test participant-load estimates with real users;
• test privacy-preserving escalation;
• implement escalation return and closure events;
• test capacity-debt aging and succession;
• conduct independent reader testing of H.1 through H.3.