artifacts/standard-named

Rendered from markdown source. Open raw source on GitHub.

Polytelometric Navigation — Comparison and Boundary Matrix

Status: draft Content canon status: unset

| Neighboring method | Existing contribution | Candidate Polytelometric addition | |---|---|---| | Multiobjective optimization | Pareto-efficient alternatives across several objectives | Telic admission, standing, consent, and protected fields | | Pareto decision support | Exploration, visualization, and selection among nondominated solutions | Governance of omitted objectives, cost bearers, and authority | | MCDA | Criteria, alternatives, weights, value models, sensitivity | Source status, boundary type, lifecycle, and correction | | Outranking | Partial order, vetoes, thresholds, incomparability | Standing and authority behind veto or noncompensation | | Value-focused thinking | Values-first objective and alternative generation | Several centers, delegation, consent, and outer-loop consequence | | Problem structuring | Contested framing and wicked problems | Versioned telic records and executable governance gates | | Robust decision-making | Adaptive routes across plausible futures | Robustness for whom, protected conditions, and adaptive consent | | Scenario planning | Strategic learning and assumption testing | Scenario provenance and missing-standing review | | Computational argumentation | Claims, support, attack, acceptability | Non-argumentative standing and route authority | | Negotiation support | Concessions, offers, mediation, agreement | Protected conditions, coercive dependence, and witnessed remainder | | Social choice | Aggregation rules, cycles, impossibility results | Nonaggregable fields, rule transparency, fork and no-decision states | | Deliberative democracy | Reason-giving and preference transformation | Source-preserving field and route records | | Polis and scalable deliberation | Clustering, consensus discovery, large-scale participation | Minority, protected, unresolved, and missing-standing fields | | Human–AI deliberation | Structured disagreement and appropriate reliance | Consent, role, cost bearer, route alternatives, and stop conditions | | Mixed-initiative systems | Dynamic allocation of initiative | Explicit delegated authority and lifecycle boundaries |

Governing distinctions

polytely ≠ polytelometry
navigation ≠ optimization
objective ≠ protected condition
preference ≠ boundary
tradeoff ≠ authorized exchange
Pareto efficiency ≠ legitimacy
consensus ≠ consent
aggregation ≠ shared telos
recommendation ≠ authority
no decision ≠ no consequence

Field classes

SHARED
COMPATIBLE
CONDITIONAL
CONFLICTING
PROTECTED
UNRESOLVED
MISSING_STANDING
RELEASED

Hard boundary

The system may compare and propose routes. It may not infer that the most measurable or computationally convenient field is entitled to rule.