artifacts/standard-named
Public-to-Technical Concept Map
artifacts/standard-named/20260715__TELIC-FIELDS__CONCEPT-MAP__WORKING__HI-S__public-to-technical.mdRendered from markdown source. Open raw source on GitHub.
Public-to-Technical Concept Map
Status: candidate freeze Version: 0.1
| Public page | Public governing question | Technical specification | Canonical technical home | |---|---|---|---| | H.0 — Public Reader Architecture | What must be visible before action? | I.0 | canonical spine, core envelope, conformance basis | | H.1 — What Matters Before the System Acts | What matters, what was shared, and what was inferred? | I.1 | source, provenance, event, correction, protected omission | | H.2 — The Projection Is Not the Person | Why is the representation not the field? | I.2 | projection, mirror, route, gate, DecisionWitness | | H.3 — When the System Should Stop | What happens when context is inadequate? | I.3 | context capacity, stop, pause, escalation, human re-entry | | H.4 — The Present Is Not the Whole Timeline | How do future standing and commitments remain visible? | I.4 | temporal standing, expiry, renewal, succession | | H.5 — Is the Loop Still Serving Its Purpose? | How do dependency, drift, lock-in, and exit appear? | I.5 | dependency, drift, fork, dissolution, residual obligation | | H.6 — What the Field Leaves Behind | How do traces become memory without becoming authority? | I.6 | semantic trails, retrieval, archive, release, forgetting | | H.7 — How Several Futures Move Together | How can public action preserve plurality? | I.7 | standing admission, option set, protected conditions, dissent, consequence return | | H.8 — The Model May Map the Field | What may the model do without becoming sovereign? | I.8 | role ledger, output class, field map, minority retention, tool boundary | | H.9 — What the Model Learned From Us | How did capability enter the model lineage? | I.9 | source standing, training authority, preference provenance, withdrawal, derivatives | | H.10 — What the Model May Do With What It Learned | How is runtime authority established and ended? | I.10 | deployment standing, runtime grants, drift, incident, succession, retirement |
Public phrase to technical record
| Public phrase | Technical record or field | |---|---| | What matters | center, telic projection, protected condition | | What was shared | source object, source status, event | | What the system inferred | receiver mirror, model inference, output class | | Who may act | standing, authority grant, role, tool grant | | Who bears consequence | affected center, cost bearer, consequence record | | How it can be corrected | contest, correction, descendant impact, repair | | How it can end | release, withdrawal, dissolution, retirement | | The option set is already a constitution | OptionSetWitness | | Low frequency is not low standing | MinorityFieldRetentionProfile | | No decision is not no consequence | AbstentionNoDecisionRecord and delay bearers | | The model may map the field | ModelFieldMap and ModelRoleAuthorityLedger | | Training is a recruitment relation | SourceDatasetStandingRecord and TrainingTransformationLineage | | Deployment creates consequence | DeploymentFieldAssembly and RuntimePurposeAuthorityGrant |
Coverage result
public pages with a technical home: 11 of 11
technical specifications with a public explanation: 11 of 11
orphan public claims: 0 blocking
orphan technical families: 0 blocking
Qualification
Coverage does not imply public comprehension, legal validity, scientific proof, or production readiness.