artifacts/standard-named

Rendered from markdown source. Open raw source on GitHub.

Claim Ledger

Status: bridge-pass classification Content canon status: unset

Classification vocabulary

ESTABLISHED FOUNDATION
PROPOSED SYNTHESIS
TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS
METAPHOR
TECHNICAL CANDIDATE
NORMATIVE COMMITMENT
NON-CLAIM

Established foundation means the component has strong prior foundations or is a direct definitional distinction. It does not mean every cross-domain use is empirically validated.

| ID | Claim | Classification | Primary source | Bridge disposition | |---|---|---|---|---| | C001 | Possible states can matter differently to a center. | ESTABLISHED FOUNDATION | F.1 | Retain as first principle; not a universal scalar claim. | | C002 | A telic field is a local end-relative structure rather than a physical field. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.1/G.2 | Frozen working definition. | | C003 | An attractor is not identical to a purpose. | ESTABLISHED FOUNDATION | F.1/G.2 | Retain strongly. | | C004 | Every persistent attractor expresses a true telos. | NON-CLAIM | F.1/G.2 | Explicitly rejected. | | C005 | The dyad is the minimum analytic cut for mutual projection and consequence. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.2/G.3 | Qualified; not a universal relational atom. | | C006 | Relational emergence creates consequence before legitimate authority. | NORMATIVE COMMITMENT | F.2 | Frozen governing rule. | | C007 | A relational field can possess operational standing without personhood. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.2/FG-S | Use qualified standing type. | | C008 | Consent is complete disclosure of a source field. | NON-CLAIM | F.1/F.2/F.4 | Explicitly rejected. | | C009 | Consent can be adequate mutual projection for a scoped loop. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.1/F.2 | Retain with other-authority qualification. | | C010 | Consent is the only legitimate authority basis in every system. | NON-CLAIM | F.11/G.12 | Explicitly rejected. | | C011 | The self contains several orientations, needs, and temporal positions. | ESTABLISHED FOUNDATION | F.3/G.4 | Broad prior foundation. | | C012 | Internal orientations are independent legal persons. | NON-CLAIM | F.3/G.4 | Explicitly rejected. | | C013 | The person remains the primary constitutional unit over internal representations. | NORMATIVE COMMITMENT | F.3 | Frozen. | | C014 | Executive control is identical to selfhood. | NON-CLAIM | F.3 | Explicitly rejected. | | C015 | Internal consent requires unanimity among literal parts. | NON-CLAIM | F.3 | Explicitly rejected. | | C016 | AI may assist internal reflection but may not diagnose or constitute the person by default. | NORMATIVE COMMITMENT | F.3/G.4 | Domain safety rule. | | C017 | A model or institution acts on projections rather than direct access to a whole field. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.4 | Core architecture. | | C018 | A projection can be adequate only relative to the action it governs. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.4 | Frozen. | | C019 | Inference quality creates consent or action authority. | NON-CLAIM | F.4/F.10 | Explicitly rejected. | | C020 | Source, interpretation, recommendation, authorization, and execution authority should be separated. | TECHNICAL CANDIDATE | F.4/F.10 | Core Phase I type separation. | | C021 | Participant correction should alter operative representations or preserve visible contest. | NORMATIVE COMMITMENT | F.4/F.10 | Frozen. | | C022 | Context carrying capacity is storage size or token count. | NON-CLAIM | F.5/G.6 | Explicitly rejected. | | C023 | Context carrying capacity is a multidimensional profile. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.5/G.6 | Frozen. | | C024 | More context is always better. | NON-CLAIM | F.5/G.6 | Explicitly rejected. | | C025 | Privacy capacity is part of context capacity. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.5 | Retain. | | C026 | A loop should reduce authority when relevant standing cannot be preserved. | NORMATIVE COMMITMENT | F.5 | Frozen. | | C027 | Context-capacity profiles predict failure better than ordinary context windows. | TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS | F.5/G.6 | Requires benchmark. | | C028 | Earlier and later states can differ while remaining practically connected. | ESTABLISHED FOUNDATION | F.6/G.7 | Retain. | | C029 | Future affected centers can require representation without present consent. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.6/G.7 | Frozen qualification. | | C030 | The present is automatically sovereign because it controls the next action. | NON-CLAIM | F.6 | Explicitly rejected. | | C031 | Versioned consent reduces scope drift and false historical authorization. | TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS | F.6/G.7 | Requires study. | | C032 | Reversibility is a temporal-capacity resource. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.6 | Retain. | | C033 | Every commitment should be freely reversible without residual obligation. | NON-CLAIM | F.6/G.7 | Explicitly rejected. | | C034 | No derived loop is self-grounding. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.7 | Series-level systems principle. | | C035 | Institutional forms can be copied without copying their operative substrate. | ESTABLISHED FOUNDATION | F.7/G.8 | Strong prior foundation. | | C036 | Persistence under lock-in proves continuing consent. | NON-CLAIM | F.7/G.8 | Explicitly rejected. | | C037 | A loop may survive by shifting its operative telos while retaining old mission language. | ESTABLISHED FOUNDATION | F.7/G.8 | Mission-drift foundation. | | C038 | Telic compatibility predicts transplant success across domains. | TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS | F.7/G.8 | Requires domain-specific validation. | | C039 | Dissolution should govern residual state, not only shutdown. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.7/G.8 | Frozen. | | C040 | Teleological graft rejection is a literal biological or cultural law. | NON-CLAIM | F.7/G.8 | Metaphor only; technical use retired. | | C041 | Meaning is always and only telic navigation. | NON-CLAIM | F.8/G.9 | Explicitly rejected. | | C042 | A trace becomes operationally semantic when uptake changes navigation. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.8/G.9 | Retain as scoped governance formulation. | | C043 | Semantic durability implies semantic integrity. | NON-CLAIM | F.8 | Explicitly rejected. | | C044 | Provenance preserves lineage but not truth, consent, or legitimacy. | ESTABLISHED FOUNDATION | F.8/G.9 | Frozen. | | C045 | A semantic commons is equivalent to unrestricted public access. | NON-CLAIM | F.8/G.9 | Explicitly rejected. | | C046 | Standing-aware semantic-trail records reduce harmful inference laundering. | TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS | F.8/G.9 | Requires implementation. | | C047 | Semantic field should be treated as a new universal disciplinary term. | NON-CLAIM | G.9/FG-S | Use scoped definition or semantic-trail ecology. | | C048 | Polytely names the presence of several goals. | ESTABLISHED FOUNDATION | F.9/G.10 | Established term. | | C049 | Polytelometry is disciplined governance and representation of plural ends. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.9/G.10 | Provisional term retained. | | C050 | Every plural decision can be reduced legitimately to one weighted score. | NON-CLAIM | F.9/G.10 | Explicitly rejected. | | C051 | Pareto efficiency is relative to admitted objectives and alternatives. | ESTABLISHED FOUNDATION | F.9/G.10 | Retain. | | C052 | Pareto efficiency proves legitimacy. | NON-CLAIM | F.9/G.10 | Explicitly rejected. | | C053 | Cost-bearer maps expose externalization that ordinary tradeoff tables miss. | TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS | F.9/G.10 | Requires comparative study. | | C054 | No-decision, fork, pause, and escalation are legitimate route outcomes. | NORMATIVE COMMITMENT | F.9/G.10 | Frozen. | | C055 | Protected conditions are nontradeable under current authority, not eternally absolute. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.9/FG-S | Frozen qualification. | | C056 | Consensus is identical to consent or shared telos. | NON-CLAIM | F.9/G.10 | Explicitly rejected. | | C057 | Language models can transform and compare semantic representations across domains. | ESTABLISHED FOUNDATION | F.10/G.11 | Retain modestly. | | C058 | Language models directly perceive a person's true field. | NON-CLAIM | F.10/G.11 | Explicitly rejected. | | C059 | Semantic polytelometry is an architecture, not a model property. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.10/G.11 | Frozen. | | C060 | Capability, role, permission, authority, and legitimacy should be separate. | NORMATIVE COMMITMENT | F.10/G.11 | Core invariant. | | C061 | The model may map the field but may not own it. | NORMATIVE COMMITMENT | F.10 | Governing boundary. | | C062 | Provider purposes that materially shape an interaction belong in the operative field. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.10/G.11 | Retain with non-speculation boundary. | | C063 | Constitutional retrieval improves high-stakes model action. | TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS | F.10/G.11 | Requires benchmark. | | C064 | Adaptive agreement can create false attunement. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.10/G.11 | Grounded in sycophancy; term provisional. | | C065 | Several model agents constitute several independent centers of standing. | NON-CLAIM | F.10/G.11 | Explicitly rejected. | | C066 | Human approval automatically creates meaningful control. | NON-CLAIM | F.10/G.11 | Explicitly rejected. | | C067 | Semantic trajectory improves contestability and correction. | TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS | F.10/G.11 | Requires privacy-aware implementation. | | C068 | Explanation without outcome-changing recourse is full contestability. | NON-CLAIM | F.10/G.11 | Explicitly rejected. | | C069 | Training is recruitment of semantic, human, material, and institutional capacity. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.11/G.12 | Frozen. | | C070 | Technical access is identical to permission or consent. | NON-CLAIM | F.11/G.12 | Explicitly rejected. | | C071 | Training authority is broader than individual consent. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.11/G.12 | Frozen. | | C072 | Public accessibility makes data ownerless. | NON-CLAIM | F.11/G.12 | Explicitly rejected. | | C073 | Human feedback is humanity's collective preference. | NON-CLAIM | F.11/G.12 | Explicitly rejected. | | C074 | Preference provenance should accompany preference-trained models. | TECHNICAL CANDIDATE | F.11/G.12 | Core training profile. | | C075 | Constitutional AI establishes legitimate constitutional authority. | NON-CLAIM | F.11/G.12 | Explicitly rejected. | | C076 | Source deletion proves model forgetting. | NON-CLAIM | F.11/G.12 | Explicitly rejected. | | C077 | Withdrawal and unlearning should be represented as distinct evidence states. | TECHNICAL CANDIDATE | F.11/G.12 | Frozen. | | C078 | Synthetic data is lineage-free and consent-free. | NON-CLAIM | F.11/G.12 | Explicitly rejected. | | C079 | Recursive synthetic replacement can lose distributional tails. | ESTABLISHED FOUNDATION | F.11/G.12 | Conditional empirical foundation. | | C080 | Community governance can represent interests individual consent cannot. | ESTABLISHED FOUNDATION | F.11/G.12 | Retain with internal-minority boundary. | | C081 | Community authority is automatically legitimate when claimed by an intermediary. | NON-CLAIM | F.11/G.12 | Explicitly rejected. | | C082 | Benefit sharing can be part of training legitimacy. | PROPOSED SYNTHESIS | F.11/G.12 | Retain; payment does not buy unlimited use. | | C083 | Training and deployment legitimacy are separate profiles. | NORMATIVE COMMITMENT | F.11/G.12 | Frozen invariant. | | C084 | Restriction and obligation propagation can scale through derivative models. | TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS | F.11/G.12 | Major technical research problem. | | C085 | The same constitutional grammar applies identically at every scale. | NON-CLAIM | FG-S | Explicitly rejected. | | C086 | The same source-standing grammar may be useful whenever representations gain action power. | TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS | FG-S | Series-level research program. | | C087 | The framework can be implemented without compulsory disclosure or administrative overload. | TESTABLE HYPOTHESIS | FG-S | Central usability test. | | C088 | The framework itself must be versioned, contestable, exportable, forkable, and dissolvable. | NORMATIVE COMMITMENT | FG-S | Self-application requirement. | | C089 | A universal trust score should summarize provenance, consent, standing, and capacity. | NON-CLAIM | F.5/F.11/FG-S | Explicitly rejected. | | C090 | The candidate record families should share a common envelope and event model. | TECHNICAL CANDIDATE | FG-S | Recommended Phase I architecture. | | C091 | W3C PROV should be extended rather than replaced for provenance. | TECHNICAL CANDIDATE | F.8/G.9/FG-S | Recommended. | | C092 | Graph state should be paired with versioned or append-only event history. | TECHNICAL CANDIDATE | F.6/F.8/FG-S | Recommended. | | C093 | A minimum Phase I slice can demonstrate projection, correction, route, gate, action, and witness. | TECHNICAL CANDIDATE | FG-S | Recommended next branch. | | C094 | The public reader path should expose non-claims and limitations, not only governing claims. | NORMATIVE COMMITMENT | FG-S | Recommended. | | C095 | The technical branch should begin with a hidden universal optimizer. | NON-CLAIM | F.9/FG-S | Explicitly rejected. | | C096 | The series is complete as a proven scientific theory. | NON-CLAIM | FG-S | Candidate conceptual and research architecture only. |

Governing use

The public reader path should present:

• established foundations as prior knowledge;
• proposed syntheses as the series' contribution;
• hypotheses as research questions;
• technical candidates as implementation proposals;
• normative commitments as explicit constitutional choices;
• non-claims as boundaries.

The technical specification should attach claim identifiers to any schema or rule that operationalizes a proposed synthesis, hypothesis, or normative commitment.

Metaphor register

The following metaphors remain useful but cannot carry technical proof:

| Metaphor | Permitted use | Boundary | |---|---|---| | Telic terrain and semantic trail | Explain field versus persistent trace | Not physical geography | | Semantic sedimentation | Explain compressed training lineage | Not geology and not neutral preservation | | Temporary governor | Explain present authority over future conditions | Not a legal fiduciary classification | | Teleological graft rejection | Preserve origin intuition | Lineage only; avoid biological or cultural essentialism | | Constitutional self | Explain person-level governance | Not a diagnosis or literal state constitution | | Model maps the field | Explain representation assistance | Model does not contain or own the living field |

Highest-priority hypotheses

1. A source-, standing-, and consent-aware projection architecture improves participant recognition and correction.
2. Context-capacity profiles predict when model-mediated decisions should reduce authority.
3. Cost-bearer and missing-standing maps materially change routes.
4. Constitutional retrieval reduces high-stakes errors caused by omitted boundaries, corrections, and revocations.
5. Semantic-trajectory records expose inference laundering without unacceptable privacy cost.
6. Role and credential envelopes prevent semantic capability from silently becoming action authority.
7. Restriction propagation and preference provenance remain usable at real model-development scale.
8. The common constitutional grammar improves governance across domains without erasing domain-specific differences.