artifacts/standard-named

Rendered from markdown source. Open raw source on GitHub.

H/I Contradiction and Omission Audit

Status: completed Version: 0.1

Result

blocking contradictions: 0
qualified tensions: 8
material omissions before Stage J: 6
publication-only omissions: 4

Qualified tensions

1. Consent versus non-consent authority

Potential conflict:

Some public formulations center consent, while technical records allow lawful public mandate, fiduciary duty, contract, license, or emergency authority.

Resolution:

Use:

consent where applicable, or another visible and reviewable authority basis

Never record another basis as consent.

2. Standing versus veto

Potential conflict:

Public emphasis on affected standing can be read as universal blocking power.

Resolution:

Standing requires admission, answerability, and consequence representation.

Veto requires a separately authorized protected condition or governance rule.

3. Protected condition versus absolute claim

Potential conflict:

A protected condition can become an unreviewable rhetorical trump.

Resolution:

Every protected condition requires:

source
protected centers
scope
authority
evidence
override process
review
status

4. Witness versus privacy

Potential conflict:

Witnessability can sound like total transparency.

Resolution:

Witness is bounded and role-scoped.

Protected omission and selective disclosure remain conforming when the gate result can be verified without exposing private content.

5. Correction versus historical truth

Potential conflict:

A corrected record may appear to erase the fact that a prior record governed.

Resolution:

Correction updates active governance and preserves the prior version, action history, and descendant impact.

6. Withdrawal versus unlearning

Potential conflict:

Public withdrawal language may imply exact model forgetting.

Resolution:

Separate governance actions from technical capability.

Use evidence-qualified labels such as:

source deleted
runtime retrieval blocked
future training blocked
approximate unlearning performed
complete removal not established

7. Human re-entry versus human supremacy

Potential conflict:

Escalation to humans may imply that human judgment is always legitimate or technically superior.

Resolution:

Human re-entry is required when protected human stakes cannot remain safe, reversible, or answerable inside the current loop.

The human still requires standing, authority, context, and witness.

8. Conformance versus legitimacy

Potential conflict:

A system may use conformance as a certification of justice or safety.

Resolution:

Conformance verifies implementation of a declared profile.

It does not certify legal, ethical, clinical, democratic, scientific, or safety legitimacy.

Material omissions before Stage J

1. Canonical identifier rules

Stage J must freeze identifier format, namespace, versioning, and collision behavior.

2. Credential and grant enforcement

The specifications describe authority semantically.

Stage J must demonstrate enforcement outside the language model.

3. Event-store semantics

Ordering, idempotency, replay, partial failure, and bitemporal query behavior require implementation rules.

4. Selective-disclosure mechanism

The architecture preserves protected omission conceptually.

Stage J must select a practical disclosure and redaction profile.

5. Threat-test harness

Negative fixtures exist by pass.

Stage J must consolidate them into one executable misuse suite.

6. Independent witness portability

Each pass exported a witness.

Stage J must prove one end-to-end export can be verified without the originating provider.

Publication-only omissions

• independent reader comprehension testing;
• visual public diagrams;
• glossary simplification;
• page-to-page navigation and progressive disclosure.

Non-blocking research omissions

• empirical measurement of context adequacy;
• comparative governance-method studies;
• formal semantics of polytelometry;
• machine-checkable community-standing logic;
• exact causal tracing through model weights.

These remain research questions and do not block the bounded reference implementation.