artifacts/standard-named

Rendered from markdown source. Open raw source on GitHub.

Semantic Polytelometry — Architecture Comparison Matrix

Status: draft Content canon status: unset

| Architecture | Actor / stakeholder model | Goals / values | Plural conflict | Source attribution | Consent | Witness / provenance | Contestability | Context capacity | Non-sovereign AI | Best reuse | |---|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---:|---| | GORE / KAOS | Strong | Strong | Moderate | Moderate | Weak | Moderate | Moderate | Weak | N/A | Goal and obstacle modeling | | i* | Strong | Strong | Strong | Moderate | Weak | Moderate | Moderate | Weak | N/A | Intentional actor dependencies | | Value-sensitive design | Strong | Strong | Strong | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Strong | Weak | Moderate | Stakeholder and value inquiry | | Computational argumentation | Moderate | Moderate | Strong | Strong | Weak | Strong | Strong | Weak | Moderate | Reason and contestability layer | | Negotiation support | Strong | Strong | Strong | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Offers, concessions, mediation | | Deliberation platforms | Strong at scale | Moderate | Strong | Moderate | Weak | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Clustering and consensus discovery | | MCDA / MOO | Weak to moderate | Strong after formalization | Strong | Weak | Weak | Moderate | Moderate | Strong mathematically | N/A | Tradeoff and alternative analysis | | Preference learning / DPO | Weak after aggregation | Collapsed into signal | Weak | Weak | Weak | Weak | Weak | Strong computationally | Weak | Model steering | | Constitutional AI | Weak | Strong principles | Moderate | Strong for constitution | Weak | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Principle-conditioned critique | | W3C PROV | Strong agents | Neutral | Neutral | Strong | Domain extension required | Strong | Strong traceability | Neutral | N/A | Provenance substrate | | Model cards / datasheets | Stakeholder-adjacent | Intended use | Weak | Strong documentation | Weak | Strong static documentation | Moderate | Weak | Moderate | Model and dataset disclosure | | Semantic polytelometry | Proposed strong | Proposed strong | Proposed strong | Required | Required | Required | Required | Required | Required | Orchestration and governance layer |

Interpretation

The matrix does not rank entire disciplines.

It identifies which components semantic polytelometry should reuse and where the proposed architecture still needs empirical justification.

Minimum claimed additions

Semantic polytelometry is distinct only if it demonstrably preserves:

1. centers of standing;
2. field/projection/mirror separation;
3. statement/inference separation;
4. consent to telic recruitment;
5. unresolved remainder;
6. relation-level teloi;
7. context capacity and stopping;
8. source correction;
9. provenance across transformations;
10. model non-sovereignty;
11. operational exit and revocation.