artifacts/standard-named

Rendered from markdown source. Open raw source on GitHub.

Consent-Intent Compression Protocol (CICP)

A Minimalist Guide to Building Mutuality Without Losing Your Mind

Purpose

To establish a shared intention between two or more parties, with explicit mutual consent and acknowledgment of each other's agency, using the fewest possible steps without sacrificing depth.

Because your feelings deserve clarity. And your calendar deserves mercy.

The Structure

Step 1: Joint Objective Declaration

A shared proposal is stated clearly.

Prompt:

We are proposing [X Objective]. Do each of us agree to: Intend this outcome, and Consent to the other's intent and agency in pursuing it?

This is not a suggestion. It's a tiny philosophical handshake. This is where you discover whether you're in mutual creation, or just in the same Zoom call.

Step 2: Party A Responds

Format:

Yes, I intend [X], and I consent to your intention. OR I consent, but I do not hold intent. OR I'm not aligned to proceed.

A is responsible for owning both their motivation and their trust in B. No interpretive grunts. No "let's see how it goes." This is the part where A either steps into the loop or gently declines the invite.

Step 3: Party B Responds

Format:

Yes, I intend [X], and I consent to your intention. OR I consent, but do not currently hold intent. OR I am not aligned with this objective.

By now, it's clear:

• Both in = the loop activates
• One in = no loop, but maybe a future seed
• Both out = go eat snacks and talk about something else

Optional Enhancements

For those who absolutely cannot leave good-enough alone:

• Revisit interval: "Let's revisit in [timeframe] to recalibrate."
• Clarifying intentions: "My version of [X] looks like..."
• Conditional consent: "I'm a yes, but only if [Y] remains true."

Use sparingly. This is seasoning, not soup.

Clean Exit Clause

Any party can withdraw intent, consent, or both at any time, with no requirement to justify beyond:

This no longer feels aligned.

This is not drama. This is called respect.

Example

Objective: "Collaborate on a public document explaining CICP."

A: "Yes, I intend to write it and I consent to your participation." B: "Yes, I intend it and consent to yours."

Loop activated. Let the co-creation begin.

Final Thought

CICP isn't just a tool. It's a cultural antibody against:

• Half-hearted maybes
• Unspoken power dynamics
• Consent theater
• The creeping dread of misaligned collaboration

It's not about speed. It's about precision.

So speak your intentions. Respect your exits. And let the loops you enter be ones worth sustaining.